Tattoos and wearable technology have long had an uneasy relationship. For many smartwatch owners, the ink that adorns their skin can inadvertently interfere with vital device functions, particularly wrist detection and biometric readings. While tech manufacturers are aware of the problem, it’s still a common surprise for consumers who purchase wearables without realizing their tattoos could cause complications.
The root of the issue lies in the technology most smartwatches use to monitor biometric data. Devices like the Apple Watch, Samsung Galaxy Watch, and similar wearables typically rely on photoplethysmography (PPG) sensors. This technology is a popular choice because it’s non-invasive, relatively inexpensive, and effective in most scenarios.
However, PPG sensors have a critical limitation: they operate by shining light onto the skin and measuring how much of that light is reflected back. Biological factors like skin tone, veins, arteries, and bones naturally absorb some of that light. As a general rule, lighter surfaces reflect more light, while darker surfaces absorb it. This creates a challenge when tattoos, especially those with dark ink, block or absorb the light, making accurate readings difficult or even impossible.
Among the most common tattoo-related issues is wrist detection failure. Without a proper connection, wearables may lock themselves, stop tracking workouts, or fail to record health data. In 2023, Samsung acknowledged the problem and began developing improvements to wrist detection technology for tattooed users. Still, the issue persists across many devices and brands.
Simple Solutions Discovered by Users
Despite the ongoing struggle, wearable users themselves have devised some creative workarounds to bypass the tattoo interference. Several Apple Watch and Galaxy Watch owners have shared do-it-yourself fixes that have shown promising results.
One Galaxy Watch user found success by placing a one-inch epoxy sticker directly over the back sensors of the watch. The added layer appeared to mitigate the tattoo’s impact, allowing wrist detection to function normally. Similarly, an Apple Watch user reported that applying clear medical tape over the sensors enabled the watch to maintain its connection, preventing it from locking up or pausing workouts during use.
These solutions are quick, inexpensive, and don’t require modifying the device itself, making them appealing to users frustrated by persistent detection failures.
Limitations of the DIY Fix
While these improvised solutions can be effective for basic wrist detection, they are not without drawbacks. Users should be aware that adding barriers, such as stickers or tape, between the sensors and the skin can interfere with more advanced smartwatch functions.
Specifically, sensors that require direct skin contact, such as those used for electrocardiogram (ECG) readings or body composition analysis, may be rendered ineffective. Both the Galaxy Watch user who pioneered the epoxy sticker trick and other commenters have noted these limitations, emphasizing that while the fix works for wrist detection, it’s not a comprehensive solution for all smartwatch features.
What Can Manufacturers Do?
As tattoos continue to grow in popularity across diverse demographics, tech companies face mounting pressure to design wearables that are more inclusive. Potential solutions could include improving sensor technology to better account for a variety of skin tones and ink colors or developing alternative biometric detection methods that aren’t light-based.
Until then, users with wrist tattoos may need to rely on community-driven hacks to get the most out of their smartwatches.
Related topics: